Washington’s War from GMT

A long while ago, or at least it seems so now, I pre-ordered Washington’s War from GMT. It’s the first time I’ve ever signed onto something on the P500. Now at the time I ordered it I was loving the Civil War themed For The People. When looking up the designer of FtP, Mark Herman, I came across We The People. I wanted to give it a try, but due to it being OOP and expensive I never picked it up. Someone though pointed me in the direction of Washington’s War which was being worked on so I decided to take the plunge.

A few months later though I got the chance to play Hannibal: Rome Vs Carthage and We The People. I took a dislike to both games because there seemed to be very little going on, other then area control.  I didn’t particularly dislike the battlecards, although they did have some problems. But the game themselves tended to be a lot of time placing and flipping control markers and very little war. I was tempted to cancel my order but I decided to hold out.

Today I couldn’t be any happier I did. First off, visually, the components will just blow you away. Its obvious that GMT put a lot of money and work into the game. The map itself is massive, and every section has some useful information on it. The cards are nice, the Rulebook and Playbook were in color which is a first for me.

I broke it out and gave it a play on my table. Although I made some rule mistakes, along with some awful dice rolls for the Americans (of course) it was fun. The first turn was really all about placing PCs, but the rest of the game involved a lot more battles and movement then I was used to with WtP or H:RvC. Battles are decided by DRM (dice roll modification) now. While the British naturally get a +1 for their regulars and another +1 due to the Royal Navy while in port, the Americans have chances to counter that based on colonial control where the battle takes place (+1 to the controller) and the Americans with a Leader can retreat before battle.

Now onto the basics of the game before I get ahead of myself. For the most part there are cards worth 1,2 or 3 operations points. There are also cards for special events but we’ll get to that. With the Operation cards you can either move a leader of an equivalent rating (a 1 can move a 1, a 2 can move a 1 or a 2 and so on) place an equivalent political control marker depending on restrictions or bring in reinforcements. There are also event cards for each side. Since the cards are side specific you can’t play them if they are for the other side. But in the past you had to discard them. Now you can discard them but flip a PC, or you can use them to add to your DRM before a battle. Using them in a battle allows you to draw another card. Discarding does not, but it does allow the other player to discard a card in order to pick up the event.

When you battle you go through a checklist to see where you can gain DRM. It’s rather easy. First off if there are any Generals you roll to see if they get to use their whole rating. A roll of 1-3 cuts that rating in half, a roll of 4-6 allows them to use it. You then add the number of CUs to each sides DRM with the General’s rating. The British can gain +1 for their regulars no matter where they are (but they can lose this +1 during the game). They also gain a +1 if they are in a port and the French Navy isn’t blockading. Either side can gain another +1 if the colony the battle is taking place in is loyal to their side. The Americans can also gain a +1 if it was an intercept. You add up the DRMs, roll a six sided dice and if the Attacker is equal or more then the Defenders, the attacker wins. The Defender must retreat (British in port can retreat via sea anywhere) and you roll for losses. The most the attacking side can lose is one CU. Each American Victory moves the French one spot closer to Alliance. If the Americans cause the British to lose 3 CUs, then the British lose their Regular bonus and the French marker moves 3 spaces.

I took pictures during play, but because of bad lighting half of them came out blurry, so I’m going to just add them to this post as a gallery. They should go in the order I took them so you might get a feel for some of the battle. Basically the Brits just destroyed everything I sent to the South, and Bendict Arnold not being able to move south and re-inforce the small army there decided the game. In short, here’s my view.

Pros:
Wonderful Production Quality
Much tighter game
More fighting and less positioning
Operations Que means you can save up OPs
New Discard rules allow a lot more flexibility
The Map is massive and full of information
The 50/50 Chance that a General might not live up to his ability.

Cons:
Lack of flavor to a lot of cards (They just read off 1 Op/2 Op/3 Op)
Low amount of event cards (half a deck out of 2 decks)
Fortified Ports/Winter Quarters have no effect on battles

Trust me though, the Cons are nothing that should keep you away from this great game. I’d recommend it for anyone looking for a grand strategic game of the Revolutionary War.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , ,

Why NBC should Fire Milbury

And for that matter keep Roenick. Since the start of the Olympics, my blog has gotten more hits then ever before. Other then my complaint about Milbury commentating I haven’t done anything that should attract more attention then normal in terms of Olympic coverage. Yet my hits over 30 days have gone from my average of 99-120 to nearly 200 hits for the last month. This is all due to NBC having Milbury as an analyst for Olympic Hockey.

You see, people are searching Milbury more then they ever had before. Since I tend to tag a lot of stuff with “Milbury Sucks”, they find my blog. That’s right, since the Olympics started people searching for “Milbury Sucks” has gone through the roof. For that matter, People are actually searching Milbury like never before, just go by this Google Trends report of Mike Milbury for the last 12 months. It spikes at the start of the Olympics. Lets just say that’s not the best sign.

Going by my google analytics, here’s how people have found my site for the last thirty days.

Mike Milbury Sucks = 32
Mike Milbury = 10
Mike Milbury Comments = 2
Milbury Sucks = 2

So 44 hits, about 1/4 of all my hits are coming via Milbury. Trust me, as much as I use the tag Milbury Sucks, I averaged 2 – 4 hits a month via Milbury.

Also interesting, my main page has 77 hits. Basically when you land on /blog is what I’m talking about. My second most hits? The page for the Tag Milbury Sucks with 34. Its halfway to getting more hits then my main page.

So if somehow NBC somehow sees this, you’ve hired a moron. A pea brained idiot whose better at saying dumb stuff then actually analyzing hockey. Meanwhile I must applaud your hire of Jeremy Roenick. He’s proven to be astute, hard working and with great relevant insights to the current game. I realize some people have issues with Roenick, but you have to ignore that feeling and realize he’s good behind the mic.

In the End though, I have to thank NBC.  Without your hiring of one of the biggest morons in hockey history I wouldn’t be getting nearly this level of exposure. Sure, its not much, but every little bit of traffic I get the better. At some point I’m going to write something that takes off, its just a matter of time.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Hockey at the Olympics

There’s a lot of talk going on about hockey at the Olympics. Especially the debate about whether the NHL should stay or go. Its not just about the shortened season or stopping an NHL season in its tracks. The argument now is that Canada or the USA is too good, and the games do nothing for Hockey. That you can’t get a read for how the Olympics effect hockey’s popularity. I for one think that a simple look at the difference between 2006 and 2010 Olympics shows that hockey is gaining traction in Europe. Especially in the smaller hockey playing countries of the world.

2006 had a different format, but all you have to do is look at what happened when the playoffs came around. In 2006 in the Quarterfinals the games weren’t close except for Finland – USA. All the other games were 2 goal wins which except for Russia-Canada were out of reach by the 3rd period. In 2010 two games went to OT (one requiring a shootout) and those two teams that lost supposedly didn’t have the talent to push it that close. Norway, another team which was supposed to be routed, mounted a huge comeback after a major penalty gave Slovakia a 2 goal lead right out the gate. Only Germany facing a pissed off Canada team truly got manhandled in the Qualification round.

Twice in the Quarterfinals a team won only by two goals in the third period. Canada again ran over a team, but it wasn’t a small country or non hockey country. Russia had no right to be destroyed, and were one of the top rated countries going into the Olympics. A round later little Slovakia put up a better fight against Canada then anything Russia managed. Russia coming out of these Olympics should be embarrassed and ashamed of their performance.

Little Slovakia took out the last Gold Medal winner Sweden. Finland defeated the Czech Republic just barely by 2 goals in the third.  USA beat Switzerland but it was another close game only won by a goal in the third and an empty netter. You couldn’t have gotten any closer then these games. These close games weren’t with teams overloaded with NHL talent, especially the Swiss and Slovaks.

The 2006 Olympics saw two blowouts in the Semis. Although the US manhandled Finland, the incredible Canada – Slovakia game was well worth every moment spent watching. Slovakia spent the game protecting their zone and counter punching. Finally when Canada started playing not to lose, Slovakia came back with two goals and if not for Demitra missing two shots at a wide open net in the closing seconds it would have went to overtime. Although the finals ending up USA – Canada, you can’t deny the improvement of a lot of smaller teams. Maybe not during pool play, but definitely once the games started to matter.

Plus if the NHL wasn’t in this Olympics, you wouldn’t have Canada’s golden boy scoring the winning goal in overtime. Obviously the US amateurs can play to the same level of the Canadians, but its much more likely with the pros. The US – Canada game was an instant classic. The great goaltending at both ends can not be denied. Ryan Miller definitely deserved to be voted MVP of the tourney. Even more incredible is that Canada had 3 goalies on their bench. Two of them have been to the Stanley Cup finals multiple times, one had one Stanley cup win, the other had multiple wins. Yet the goalie that leads them to the Gold has never been past round two of the playoffs. Hopefully Roberto Luongo will get some more respect that he deserves.

I say keep the NHL in the Olympics. Its obvious that the sport in Europe is only getting bigger as time goes by. Just like when the Dream Team in the Olympics routed everyone the first time, in a few years the Dream Team became the Nightmare Team and Europe overtook Team USA. We are getting closer and closer to the day that Russia/Canada/USA aren’t going to run roughshod over the Olympics.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

TO to the Jets?

Last year a lot of people laughed when Buffalo signed Terrell Owens. I thought it was a good move, it was a one year contract, gave them a star and it was obviously the last chance for their coach to make the Playoffs. Trent Edwards ended up just not being good enough, and Owens along with his normal drops was keyed on.

Now a free agent, with an uncapped year, the Jets should take a long hard look at TO. TO for that matter should look at the Jets. The Jets, a Half away from making the Super Bowl, would be a perfect landing place for an older Owens looking to win the big game once and for all. Paired up with Edwards on the other side, it gives two great targets for Sanchez anywhere on the field. Those are two WRs that will give any team fits, no matter their drops or age.

Now some people will say that the Jets will never take a chance like this. That Owens history is too much trouble. Personally I think Rex Ryan is a strong enough coach/personality to get him under control. Like with Owens first season in Philly, I can see it being another love/hate relationship which everyone feeds off of. There’s also no reason to give TO more then a year. With the possible lockout there’s no reason to not do everything possible to win Now.

I do hope the Jets bring back Edwards. But the pairing of Edwards and TO will give the Jets a duo they haven’t had since early this decade. Back in the days when Wayne Chrebet could always get a 1st down on 3rd downs and Cole was a threat anywhere on the field. We’re talking about almost a decade ago. It’s always been tough for the Jets to get a great receiver. The last thing they should do now is pass up on signing an elite aging WR who can still make a difference on the field.

Speaking of FA’s, what the hell are the Jets doing with the Kicker position? Feely played his heart out last season and worked double time in the playoffs. They then bring in Nick Folk who was just awful last season for the Cowboys and whose kickoffs were so bad they signed a kickoff specialist.  The Jets should have learned this playoffs how important a good clutch kicker is. Feely proved he was Clutch (and that he should have been AFC’s Pro Bowl Kicker) in the playoffs. Just give him the money he wants.

Finally, if you can bring in Pennington as a backup and mentor to Sanchez do it. Don’t kid yourself that Clemens is going to somehow go anywhere and suddenly remember how to pass the football. The kid is a bust bust bust and its time to cut the string. If not Pennington, please bring in someone who has experience so if Sanchez goes down for any extended amount of time (it has happened) the season isn’t lost.

I know from experience that the Jets are going to screw this offseason up, one way or another. We were so close yet so far last year.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Infamous Goaltending Busts

These are mostly from the last two decades or so. It seems like there are always a few goalies who the powers that be proclaim to be the next big thing. Yet goalie is one of the most interesting positions in any sport. Your the only player who plays the whole game, just about every minute.  Sometimes a team and a goalie just don’t mesh, sometimes a backup is just meant to stay backup. Here are some of the more memorable ones.

Damian Rhodes

People were talking about him just needing a chance for a while. That chance wasn’t coming with Felix “The Cat” Potvin in net. He eventually made his way to the awful but improving Ottawa Senators. Splitting time with Also-Ran Ron Tugnutt it slowly became clear that Rhodes had peaked while Tugnutt continued to improve and won the job. He was then picked up by the Thrashers, who proceeded to be one of the all time worst expansion teams. Although it can be argued that his struggles weren’t all his fault, his time in Atlanta was the end of his career. From promising Backup to out of the league in only Six years.

Eric Fichaud

Another former Leaf. The 16th overall pick in 1994 was talked of as the “Next Roy”.  By now that’s almost a warning sign not to pick up a goalie. Although impressive in the AHL, Milbury had told anyone that would listen that this kid was the future of the franchise. He was called up far too early, and through three years on the Island he lost the starting job to Tommy Salo. Following his last season as an Islander he never again reached double digit games and became the quintessential journeyman goalie a team picked up when it needed a cheap backup or third stringer. His last NHL playing time was in 2001, meaning another goalie from promising elite to out of the league in only six years.

Dan Cloutier

Growing up in NYC, I never heard the end of it about Cloutier. He was the next big thing, and the overrated Goon and his run in with Salo always annoyed me. I knew his trade to the Lightning was going to be his ending. It would have been a majority of the time. Two seasons with a sub .900 sv% looked like the end of the road for him. Unfortunately the Canucks grabbed him off the scrap heap and put a NHL caliber team in front of him. He still struggled as a starter before being shipped off to the Kings when the team got Roberto Luongo. Out of hockey now, he’s so infamous for being a bad goalie that there’s a picture of him with a beach ball in the net.

Garth Snow

The Poor Flyers. Every few years their backup gets hot in the playoffs, they think they have finally taken care of their weak goalie position, he ends up being a bust the next season. Snow was highly touted in the time between his being drafted and making the NHL. He had an incredible run. Ending up in Philly behind Hextall,he got hot and helped lead the Flyers to the Confrence finals. The following year there was High expectations, but he didn’t really pan out and Hextall was back as starter. A few more years in Vancouver, Penguins and finally a few years (with one outstanding season) for the Islanders before calling it quits. He is far above expectations when it comes to being a General Manager.

Marc Denis

Another one of those “Next Patrick Roy” he was helped by playing behind Roy himself. A Former first rounder, he had two really good seasons behind Roy before being tagged in the expansion draft by Columbus. In four years in Columbus he did have two outstanding seasons, but could never get to the 30 Win plateau. After being traded to the Lightning he hit career lows with a .889 SV% Followed by a .859 and a later stint with Montreal he only managed a .857 SV%. His career is all but over already.

Mike Dunham

A lot of Jersey Goalies could take this spot. But Dunham, drafted the same year as Brodeur had a lot of fans and pundits predicting greatness. The Devils themselves went so far as to (Claimed by his agent) underplay him so either he couldn’t be a RFA or he wouldn’t be in the Expansion Draft. In the end he was picked up the expansion Predators. He had some good seasons too, but injuries would continually pile on. When the Predators gave up on him and went with Vokoun, things wouldn’t get better. Of his next four seasons after the Predators he only managed to get back above a .900 SV% once, and that was his first year with the Rangers. Like another goalie on this list, he finished his career on the Island and ended up moving to become a coach at the end of his career. Meanwhile Brodeur is still protecting the crease in Jersey.

These are almost all going off memory and some checking via Wikipedia and HockeyDB. If I got anything wrong feel free to comment, My memory is not that good.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why is Milbury on TV?

Watching the USA Vs Switzerland (Lets Go Swiss and Mark Streit!) this afternoon, I asked myself a question. Why is Milbury on TV? Your looking for analysts when you start up, but please NBC, consider his history. Consider the absolute path of failure he lead the Islanders to. Look at his disastrous trade after trade after trade. A complete lack of knowledge when it comes to current players. This was someone who traded you AND THEN you became an All-Star. Only after you left his reign of insanity did you become the player that everyone said you would become.

So why the rant this time? Obviously if you’ve been here before you’ve seen my many posts on Milbury and his destruction of the Islanders. Today during the second intermission of the USA-Swiss game the analysts began talking about Team Canada. The decision was made to go with Roberto Luongo over Martin Brodeur for today’s game. Milbury was immediately up in arms over the matter. Proclaiming that Brodeur was the greatest ever and there was no reason to go with Luongo. Thankfully the person in studio with him began arguing for Luongo to get the start, that at the very least they should see what Luongo could do or at very least give Brodeur a breather. Milbury was unrelenting on his Anti-Luongo crusade and saying that this was a bad move for Team Canada.

What doesn’t Milbury or anyone in studio mention during this rant? That Milbury originally drafted Luongo and after one season behind an awful Islanders team decided to trade him. That this trade is usually considered one of the worst trades in the history of the NHL. It’s no surprise really that Milbury would take a shot at Luongo. Could you imagine what Milbury might feel like if Luongo helps lead Team Canada to the Gold? Probably nothing because he’s a heartless spawn of the devil who was only created to ruin the New York Islanders for 10 years. But whenever someone goes into detail about Luongo they’ll talk about that trade. Point out that when Florida traded Luongo they had no choice because they couldn’t afford him. But Milbury’s trading of Luongo? It was insanity.

So thank you NBC for making Milbury an analyst again when no real network would touch him with a ten foot pole (He was fired from Hockey Night in Canada) unless they are in the Boston area. I hate you Boston. It’s amazing because NBC loves to bring in questionable analysts. With all the possible talking heads for Hockey and Football, NBC decides that Mike Milbury and Matt Millen are the two best qualified guys for the job. I would love to see those two team up together and take over a franchise. Then see how far they could bury said franchise into the ground. Please NBC, there are lots of other better analysts out there. There are lots of talented former NHL players around who probably know the league and the talent far better then Milbury.

In case you thought Milbury was right in his arguement, here’s a little something about Brodeur. Brodeur has a 2-3-1 record in February, has given up 18 goals in six games and played to a save percentage of .850 or below in three of them. I would also go with the seven year younger Luongo. Luongo also hasn’t been played to death like Brodeur has with the Devils. Lets go Luongo, win a gold for Canada!

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Golden Milbury

The Golden Milbury

The Golden Milbury

That’s right, its time to give away an award. The Golden Milbury will be given to the team that makes the dumbest move (or moves) during the season. Now I need your help since I mostly follow the Islanders. There will eventually be a poll to choose the winner (or if no one votes, a judge will decide) of The Golden Milbury. My personal choices?

Carolina Waives Leighton

Following the horrible injury to Cam Ward, the Canes decided to dust off Manny Legace of all people and call him in ahead of Leighton who had been their long term backup. When Cam Ward returned, the Canes waived Leighton and the Flyers (coached by former Canes coach Lavoilette) desperate for a backup picked him up. Not only has he started in the premiere game of the regular season, but the Canes are playing half his salary AND Legace is their backup. For comparison’s sake.

GP W  L OTL   GAA SV%
Micheal Leighton 18 12  3     1     2.19 .920
Ray Emery              29 16 11    1     2.64 .910
Manny Legace        19   7  6    3     3.05 .900

Toronto Signs Kessel

Brian Burke. That’s all you really have to say. The argument about whether he’s good or he inherited good positions could go on forever. In his attempt to turn around Toronto he signed the talented Phil Kessel, whose rights cost him a first and second rounder in the 2010 draft and a first in the 2011 draft. Now the hope might have been to improve Toronto enough that the draft pick was a high one. Unfortunately despite Kessel leading the team in goals, Toronto has struggled all year and this years picks look like they might be a top five pick. Also of note is that any pick of the top 4 could possibly become a first overall pick due to the lottery.

Kings let Moulson go

It isn’t so much that they let him go, but they didn’t really try to re-sign him. A rebuilding Kings team could only give Moulson (a former 9th round pick) 29 games over two seasons in the NHL and only 10 points in those games. The Islanders after drafting John Tavares (an old linemate of Moulson’s) decided to sign him. He impressed from camp and just kept rolling from there. He’s the Islanders first twenty goal scorer in a few seasons and the Kings are kicking themselves for missing out on him.

Flyers Sign Emery

After making a big splash by trading for Pronger and showing they wanted to win now, the Flyers decided to go with enigmatic goaltender Ray Emery to lead them to the Cup. Now Emery does have a run to the Stanley Cup finales on his resume. But that was with a very good Senators team in front of him. Ottawa soured on him so quickly (due to off ice incidents) that the following year they bought out his contract. He did have an impressive run in the KHL last year, he still had off ice issues and arguments with the team. Although quiet off the ice, he has suffered injuries and his play left the door open for Boucher and Leighton to take over the starting job. In fact it wouldn’t be surprising if the playoffs started today and Emery was healthy if Lieghton was starter still. The cap is also another consideration in his deal, but in the end former Flyer Goalie Martin Biron could have been signed for nearly the same amount. Also former backup Nittymaki has been outstanding for Tampa Bay this year

Now that’s my four favorites, but bookmark this page. As the trading deadline passes I want to know what you think is one of the worst moves this year. Comment on this blog or email me (located at bottom of page) via the contact form. I want to make the vote for The Golden Milbury that much more fun.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Battlelore

Deeper In Castile

Battlelore is another one of my favorite games. The map is split into three sections, cards tend to allow units to move in only one section at a time. The units are either 4 Strong (infantry) or 3 Strong (Cavalry). The dice have all three colors of units, Green – Militia Blue – Average Red – Elite, and dice rolls of the color being attacked are hits and take a unit away. Once a unit’s flag is lost it is put in the corner and counts towards a preset goal. There are also Dwarfs and Goblins, with Dwarfs being brave and Goblins being frightened.

Well that’s a quick look, this battle is called Deeper in Castile and is the first time both Dwarfs and Goblins face off, with the Dwarfs looking impossible to dislodge from a mountain range in the middle of the map. Lets see how this goes as Don Pedro the Cruel and his Goblins face off against Henry of Trastamaria and his Dwarfs. BTW I tried to get played cards into the shot, didn’t think about it at first. Enjoy, hopefully.

An amazing victory from 4 down for Henry to capture victory 6 flags to 5. A well played Battlelore card at the end of the game sealed the victory.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Random Markland Pictures

These are mostly from events in which I didn’t have the Camera, can’t remember the event or only took a few pics.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , ,

Scott Gordon deserves One More Year

I’m going to make this somewhat short and sweet. The Islanders success last month is now a double edged sword. People were/are unwilling to admit that this was an over achieving team. Short memory also means that most people forget how bad this season started off in September/October. I’m not worried, if the team is going to get cold then its better to get cold in February then in April. Just ask last year’s Penguins how that works.

But people seem to be really down on Scott Gordon. I just wanted to say at the very least he deserves one more year if not two. First off, you can throw last year’s team away. Not only was it his first season, but everything that could go wrong did go wrong. I still wonder why on earth Dubie wasn’t brought back as a backup. This season the Islanders have been impressive for large periods of time, especially for a team that was considered by many to be the worst in the league. The other bright spot for the Islanders this year? The continued development of prized prospects Bailey, Okposo, Tavares along with the breaking out of Schremp and Moulson. Also factor in two players were considered marginal NHL replacements, MacDonald and Kohn, have played well enough to displace Witt. You memory doesn’t have to be that good to remember 10-15 years ago and all our prospects who did horrible on the Island and great elsewhere.

Another reason to keep Gordon is stability. I say the same thing about the Jets, during the time I’ve been a Jets fan it seems like every 3-4 years we get a new coach. Meanwhile the Giants have been to two Super Bowls and a contender while only hiring 3 coaches during the same period. There’s something to be said of having a coach for more then just two seasons. I think recent Islander history shows so much.

From 1972 to 1994 (22 years) the Islanders won 4 Stanley Cups, made it to Five Finals and over 200 Playoff Games (128 Playoff Wins) with 5 Coaches including Al Arbour Twice.

From 1994 to 2010 (16 years) the Islanders have made the playoffs 4 Times, played a total of 22 Playoff games and 6 Playoff wins. They also have not made it out of the first round.  During this time they have had 12 coaching changes (not including Arbour’s special game) with Lorne Henning and Mike Milbury each having two separate stints.

Gordon was the coach picked by Snow. So far they seem to be working well together.  Snows free agent signings seem to be players who will work the best in Gordon’s system. If you get rid of Gordon now your upsetting the chemistry, possibly upsetting the youth, and worst of all you might be starting from scratch. If you bring in someone and they want players A,B and C, suddenly its a whole new game plan. Quite truthfully as long as the young players continue showing improvement this is going to be a good team and Gordon is a success.

So give Gordon one more year. Let’s see if the youth keeps developing. Let’s see if DiPietro  can return to old form. Let’s see if Snow can get another Moulson/Streit/Schremp level pickup in the offseason. When Milbury was in charge during his first few years there was always signs of insanity lurking in the background. I have faith in Snow which I didn’t before this season. I think Gordon’s the right guy for what Snow is planing, and stability when it comes to coaching is a good thing.

  • AIM
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,