Posts tagged: Scam

Ryan Kaldari, Same Wiki Lies, New Wiki Face

By , July 29, 2011 2:41 pm

Gotta give Wiki (pedia/Media) credit. Last time they were running a campaign they recognized that splattering Jimmy Wales photo all over the place was attracting a ton of bad publicity (quote “This is exactly why we cannot leave Jimbo up for 2 MONTHS”). The laundry list of abuses by Jimmy Wales is amazingly long:

  • Using Wiki money to pay for his flights/expenses to personal speaking engagements
  • Editing his girlfriends wikipedia entry both while dating and after they broke up
  • Editing his former partners wikipedia entry in order to make it seem like he was the sole founder of Wikipedia
  • Taking in 5 and 6 figure sums for public speaking engagements, while claiming to make no money from Wiki media/pedia. The only reason people want to talk to him is because he was the cofounder.

Is just a taste. So it’s time to go with someone who can actually relate to the people that work/read Wikipedia instead of a smug douchebag. Ryan Kaldari is the opposite of Jimmy Wales. At least so much as he comes off as a hipster, a gentle person who isn’t about to take your money and waste it.

Even so, the same issues that exist with Jimmy Wales exist with Ryan Kaldari. Wikimedia Foundation is spending far too much money on everything else. For a not-for-profit organaztion, Wikimedia is sitting on more then enough money to allow it to survive for at least 3-4 years. The biggest problem currently? The amount of money the Foundation is sinking into the ever ballooning employee payroll. Hiring 32 people should not cost as much as it does for them.

The reality is that I’ve done these rants at least twice before, you can read the first one and then the second one. I beg you, if your really going to donate money donate it to someone that does good like wikileaks. Also take a trip to Charity Navigator and realize that they give Wikimedia a horrible efficiency review of 26.50. Hell, you’d almost be better off donating money to Encyclopedia Dramatica then Wikimedia.

It ends up after a little more searching I found out this is an ongoing thing. They are comparing different people and wording to Jimmy Wales appeal to see if they can use other people instead of Wales and still get the same amount of donations. If you see any of the ads, I’d say click through them, but donate nothing just to screw with their results.

Vlog: I review Battlelore: Dragons, Creatures and Heroes

By , June 17, 2010 7:48 pm

Sorry about the shaky camera, those boxes are annoying to open. If anyone actually likes these I may try to do some more, depending on the response. I might actually polish them in the future.

Jimmy Wales’ Appeal – Snicker

By , December 19, 2009 8:19 am

Having fun picking apart Jimmy Wales’ appeal for YOU to donate to Wiki. Of course lets not mention that he gets big money on the lecture circuit now, or that the corporate side of the Wiki is loaded moneywise. My comments in Italics

An appeal from Wikipedia (co) founder, Jimmy Wales

Today, I am asking you to make a donation to support Wikipedia. (Wikimedia Foundation which oversees Wikipedia is currently 5 Million in the green for 2009, up from 3 Million in 2008.  During the same period the Salaries of Wikimedia made the biggest jump from 1.1 million in 08 to 2.2 million in 09. No other expense Doubled)
I started (co founded with Larry Sanger) Wikipedia in 2001, and over the past eight years, I’ve been amazed and humbled to see hundreds of thousands (although there are more vandals then actual contributors) of volunteers join with me to build the largest encyclopedia (Doesn’t an encyclopedia have to be factual?) in human history.

Wikipedia isn’t a commercial website (Thats what Wikia is for, and the reason most of the bigwigs of Wikimedia Foundation go on speaking tours). It’s a community creation, entirely written and funded by people like you (Yes, you if your 15-28 years old and can fake having multiple doctorates) . More than 340 million people use Wikipedia every month – almost a third of the Internet-connected world. You are part of our community. (Not really, but hey, if it floats your boat…)

I believe in us (He means his cabal of high level editors and admins who run roughshod over everyone else. Wiki editors have famously argued with actual survivors of the USS Liberty incident in the discussion pages) . I believe that Wikipedia keeps getting better. (How is beyond me, the vandals manage to routinely double the amount of damage in an hour that we can fix) That’s the whole idea. One person (Idiot) writes something, somebody improves  it a little (argues with them), and it keeps getting better (whichever side can bring in the most high ranking admin/editors in the debate gets to keep their Point of View in. Or someone guts the whole article and makes it a useless stub), over time. If you find it useful today, imagine how much we can achieve together in 5, 10, 20 years. (Colleges and High Schools have already banned using Wikipedia as a source. Plus imagine how much better the vandals can get in 5, 10, 20 years)

Wikipedia is about the power of people like us (yes, because when I want to learn about history or WW1, I don’t want to read about it from someone whose dedicated their life to it. No, I want a novice that read a few books and watched a few movies but is dam good at gaming the system to tell me about WW1) to do extraordinary things. People (idiots) like us write Wikipedia, one word at a time. People like us fund it. (Then fund it from your own dam pocket, your making plenty from your speaking engagements and other events. Hell for the most part you don’t even bother with Wikipedia anymore unless its a dire situation or it makes you look bad.) It’s proof of our collective potential to change the world. (Its proof of everything that’s wrong with the internet in one place.)

We need to protect the space where this important work happens. (Well you already OWN the servers according to the finances of Wikimedia Foundation. Plus with 8 Million to spare I doubt Wiki is going to go broke tomorrow) We need to protect Wikipedia. We want to keep it free of charge and free of advertising. (Haha, they just use Wikipedia to help promote Wikia now since Wikia is the for profit brand they don’t care how much advertising they plaster on that) We want to keep it open – you can use the information in Wikipedia any way you want. (Did he just promote Vandalizing Wiki? woohoo) We want to keep it growing – spreading knowledge everywhere, and inviting participation from everyone. (Unless you know, your not one of our inner cabal of high editors/admin then fuckoff. But feel free to do Recent Change Patrol!)

The Wikimedia Foundation is the non-profit organization I (Ego much at all?) created in 2003 to operate, grow, nurture, and protect Wikipedia. (What does Wikimedia protect Wikipedia from?) For ten million US dollars a year (What a lie, current expenses for the whole Wikimedia Foundation are FAR LESS then 10 Million. Not only that but most of the expenses are SALARY EXPENSES. How much more money does Wikimedia need sitting in the bank?) and with a staff of fewer than 35 people (so 2.2 Million divided by 35 is 65000 a year for everyone who works there. I’m sure Wales and the other heads of Wikimedia don’t take more then their fair share in this wonderful project) , it runs the fifth most-read website in the entire world. I’m asking for your help so we can continue our work. (Didn’t AOL used to do this? They farmed out the work of controlling AOL chat rooms to “Community Volunteers” and at some point a court found it illegal?)

Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet has free access to the sum of all human knowledge. (The sum of all human knowledge? Really? Because pretend PHDs = Knowledge I guess) That’s where we’re headed. And with your help, we will get there.

Thank you for using Wikipedia. You’re part of this story: please make a donation today. (Or please Vandalize something, it would actually be more constructive then donating)

Jimmy Wales

(Co) Founder, Wikipedia

Seriously, what a jackass load of bullshit. Can anyone can take this seriously? The quotes I used are actually supplied on the Wikimedia Foundation website. I used This PDF which compared 2008 to 2009. Not surprisingly when you go to the FAQ supplied with this “plea” they only give you a link to Wikimedia’s 2007 finances. Although Jimmy doesn’t get paid from Wikimedia he does get to collect 75K in speaking fees whenever someone wants him to speak. The only reason someone would want him to speak? Wikipedia.

Oh and lets not forget that Larry Sanger co-founded wikipedia.

Love & Stupidity

By , November 20, 2009 2:28 pm

So this is a story of warning. I’m not saying it has ever happened, but much of this is fiction. Its like how “Let There Be Blood” is based on Upton Sinclair’s “Oil”. So sit back, grab some popcorn, and find out why love is stupid.

I happened to meet these two people who were engaged. John and Jane had been together for about six or seven years. Originally they were planing a wedding when I met them, but she became a bridezilla and they canceled it. They eventually became swingers. The fun fact in that is that she basically had total control over it. So she fucked who she wanted and if anyone showed interest in John she would chase them away.

To make matters worse, they get an apartment together. Since he’s too dumb to do math, he just gives her his paycheck every week and lets her do the budget. Since she liked to drink a bit too much they were always ending up short. Of course you couldn’t mention that to him, or maybe that they didn’t need a few luxuries they had when they moved in.

This situation proceeded to get more interesting. A friend from the past named Larry lost his job because he fell off the wagon again. Suddenly not able to pay for his house he was living back home in the area with his mom. Jane had a supreme crush on Larry and began going after him like a fly after rancid meat. Larry, disturbed because Jane was rather disgusting to look at, refused to have sex with her. He used the old standby, oh if you weren’t dating one of my best friends sure.

So, in a move of brilliance, she decides that a one night stand is worth ending an almost ten year relationship. They break up, she moves out, and Larry still won’t fuck her with a ten foot pole. So we end up having a chat with John, trying to convince him he’s better off. We tell him he’s been getting used, she’s a whore, she’s a controlling maniac. He decides to start writing poetry. The English language is not John’s strong suit. He then sends one of his poems to the “Library of Poetry” which is just a scam organization to get you to buy some massively overpriced book of crappy poetry. We try to inform him of this, as googling Library of Poetry and Scam comes up with more then enough evidence.

So what you may ask is the next step? Well six months come and go and in an absolute miracle John meets a new girl. Not just any girl, but basically a Godsend in comparison to his ex. So after the first date he starts talking about her to all of his friends. Now news travels like lightning in the group and Jane  finds out pretty quickly. Single and lonely she takes it upon herself to accidentally be hanging around his place when he has a date.

Amazingly, after three dates, Jane decides she wants to get back together with John. We all tell John to head for zee hillz. She mistreated him a majority of the relationship and basically used him. The new girl is just a slice of heaven and everyone  actually likes her. She isn’t controlling or insane. But John says “I’m in Love” and won’t hear any arguments. John and Jane get back together, and they both make each other miserable to this day.

What does this teach us? If you think your in love, Listen to your friends you dumbfuck. Sometimes the grass is actually greener on the other side. Sometimes you can be in a relationship for 10-15 years and have it end. Every ending is a new beginning, just go out there and try again. And in the end, Jane’s probably going to break up with him the next time she wants a guy and the guy says “Oh, I can’t while your dating someone”.

Still Siriusly Screwed

By , September 4, 2009 1:21 pm

So now the dust has settled and Sirius has merged. Where has the average Sirius customer found themselves?

  1. The once free internet feed with a subscription is no longer. You must pay for the higher quality stream now. Of course many people point out that packaging advertised the free internet stream as a way to listen when you were out of Satellite range.
  2. That whole promise of getting Baseball and Hockey? Not so much.  Sirius claimed they couldn’t just add the channels from XM to Sirius. So you could pay for the best of XM. Of course that didn’t come with Baseball or Hockey games, just the NHL and MLB Channels which don’t broadcast games. A few weeks later they somehow managed to combine all the Sirius and XM music channels and broadcast them to both.
  3. Now Sirius is adding a Licensing fee. This is something that Sirius had paid itself previously. It seems like nothing more then a way to raise rates while getting around their promise to freeze rates. Pretty much if you want the same service that you got before the merger you now have to pay two more fees on top of the rate you paid.
  4. Extra charges for multiple subscriptions. Previously your 2nd sub only cost 6.99 and it now costs 8.99.

So where is the FCC? The same FCC that held up the merger for over a year because it was worried about a monoploy. Where are all the represenatives that complained about Sirius during this time? While the customers are getting gouged and getting rate increases in everything but name, they are silent. Its obvious that Sirius has broken its agreement not to raise rates. Just because of a technicality it should be allowed to dance all over the corpse of that agreement?

Apparently if you bribe the government to fight competition, government will fight for you. But when your the average citizen expecting to be protected from big companies, your fucked.